• Become a Subscribing Member today!

    The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web.

    Why become a Subscribing Member?

    • In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.
    • We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction).
    • Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.

    Become a Subscribing Member and access the Biplane Forum in full!

    Subscribe Now

MT or Catto?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
1,230
Reaction score
621
My new-to-me S1 has a fixed pitch metal Sensenich mounted onto an ageing 180 Lyc. I am more concerned about lightening the load on the crank than I am getting better performance--although I would happily take a performance improvement. I am leaning Catto because two mechanics I trust swear by it. A three-blade Catto is about the same as a two-blade MT after Steen Aero's discount on the MT. I'd like to know of any experiences with either prop from those of you who have tried them. Are the issues with rain real or overblown? And, in the case of the Catto, is the nickel leading edge worth the extra expense.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top