• Become a Subscribing Member today!

    The Biplane Forum is a large global active community of biplane builders, owners and pilots. From Pitts to Skybolts, to older barnstormers, all types are welcome.

    The Biplane Forum is a private community. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched source of information not found anywhere else on the web.

    Why become a Subscribing Member?

    • In addition to our active community, our content boasts exhaustive technical information which is often sought after for projects and maintenance. This information has accumulated over the 12+ years the forum has been in existence.
    • We are also a great resource for non biplane users, since many GA aircraft are built the same way (fabric and tube construction).
    • Annual membership also comes with two BiplaneForum.com decals.

    Become a Subscribing Member and access the Biplane Forum in full!

    Subscribe Now

LeRoy Cook in Plane and Pilot - can he write a column without making a mistake?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

wil780

Well-Known Member
*
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
226
Reaction score
120
The latest flub, in the October issue, while describing how to do a loop in a glider: ". . . I will manage the energy by making a constant-G pull-up that converts the airspeed into altitude most efficiently." I've never flown a glider, so maybe that is a valid way to do a loop in one, but it certainly won't make the tallest loop. The increasing angle of attack needed to maintain constant g as speed drops will cause much more induced drag than progressively reducing the g load. I'm sufficiently annoyed about this egregious error that I'm tempted to write a letter to the editor, but I'm deterred by my lack of experience in gliders. So I decided to post my rant here instead.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top